Un raccourci dans le temps

Je crois bien qu'il aurait d'abord fallu payer les scénaristes plus cher et les faire travailler plus fort.

Cela dit, le film vaut le détour. Il raconte une belle histoire et met de l'avant de belles valeurs, sans jamais être lourd ou prêchi-prêcha. Juste pour cette raison, il faut aller voir A Wrinkle in Time.

Cette adaptation ambitieuse et tape-à-l'oeil d'un roman de Madeleine L'Engle par Ava DuVernay s'apparente à un croisement à la sauce Disney d'Avatar, Interstellar et Cloud Atlas. 

If you laughed derisively at that line, you shouldn't see A Wrinkle in Time. If it made you smile, go. 

Ava DuVernay's screen adaptation has its charm ? but Madeleine L?Engle?s novel still earns its "unfilmable" rep.

Most of us would like simply to praise A Wrinkle in Time for its multiracial cast, its multicultural soundtrack, and its ringing message of self-acceptance.

Less than a month after Black Panther, Ava DuVernay's fantasy tentpole makes strides for representation, while botching key aspects of the beloved Madeleine L'Engle novel.

Ava DuVernay's singular take on Madeline L'Engle's beloved book is inclusive, empathetic, visually sumptuous - and all over the place.

The film is most tolerable when it remains centered on the three kids, their bickering and their underlying "there for you" inter-dependency. 

Overall, A Wrinkle in Time is perfectly watchable, even if it gets annoying how all the big, emotional set-pieces are constantly undercut by power anthems off the soundtrack album. 

Despite some sharp visuals and interesting ideas, A Wrinkle in Time ultimately tells a meandering story that fails to capture the magic of the source material.